Proposals to change the law on assisted suicide
Talk confidentially to
Samaritans any time of the day or night.
Whatever you're going through, whether it's big or small, don't
bottle it up. We are here for you if you're worried about
something, feel upset or confused, or just want to talk to
someone.
Proposals to change the law on assisted
suicide
An amendment to the Coroners and Justice Bill was defeated
in Parliament this month (July 2009), designed to protect from
criminal prosecution those who assist their loved ones in
travelling abroad to end their lives.
Lord Falconer of Thoroton, a previous Lord Chancellor, led
the amendment. The proposals were co-signed by former
Leader of the House of Lords and Health Spokesperson, the Rt Hon
Baroness Jay of Paddington, barrister Lord Lester QC, and Lord Low,
Chairman of RNIB.
In support of the tabled amendment, Baroness Jay said in a
statement to the press: "We need to wake up to the reality of what
is happening. There are now nearly 800 Britons who are members of
the Swiss assisted suicide clinic Dignitas, and over 100 Britons
who have travelled abroad to die."
She added that within "necessary safeguards", which the
amendment seeks to provide, those who travel abroad to assist the
suicide of their loved one should not be criminalised.
Under UK law it is not against the law to travel abroad to have
an assisted suicide in a country where it is legal, but it is
against the law to accompany or enable somebody to travel abroad to
die - a crime punishable by up to 14 years in
prison.
MS sufferer Debbie Purdy has recently appealed to the House of
Lords to get clarity on the current law on assisted suicide. In a
high profile case, Ms Purdy is seeking clarification to ensure her
husband will not be prosecuted if he travels abroad with her when
she decides to take her own life.
Legal "inconsistency"
In driving forward the proposals, Lord Falconer emphasised an
"inconsistency" between the law and current prosecuting policy.
While the law makes assisting suicide a crime, the current Director
of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and his predecessor have not sought
prosecutions for those cases where assisted suicide has been
evident, citing insufficient public interest in doing so.
Writing in the Times, Lord Falconer said that he was not calling
for a full scale review of the suicide law, as this "important
debate needs proper time and full engagement from both the public
and Parliamentarians". Instead, he stated, he is tabling the
amendment to make sure "that the law reflects the sensible position
adopted to date by the courts and the DPP, while protecting people
from abuse".
The proposed amendment said that two doctors must confirm,
independently of each other, that the person travelling abroad to
die is terminally ill and competent to make such a decision. The
patient must also put their request in writing in the presence of
an independent witness who does not stand to benefit from their
death.
A similar amendment by former Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt
has already been defeated in the Commons, the Daily Mail
reports.
A moral objection
However, the issue of reassessing the legal position of assisted
suicide has met with virulent opposition from Christian
communities. One of Britain's most senior Roman Catholic leaders
has spoken out in anger at Lord Falconer's attempts to bring about
a change in the law.
The Most Reverend Peter Smith, the Archbishop of Cardiff, said:
"Legalising assistance with suicide is morally wrong in itself and
would put vulnerable people at grave risk," the Daily Mail
reports.
Members of the House of Lords have also voiced opposition to the
propsals, which have previously been brought before Parliament. As
reported in the Daily Mail, Lord Alton of Liverpool said: "This is
the third time we have had an attempt to legislate in this way in
this Parliament." He added the British Medical Association and the
royal colleges "remain opposed to any change" because, he says,
"they know it would change irreversibly the medical profession if
doctors and nurses have to become destroyers of life rather than
defenders".
Support for change
Pro-euthanasia campaigners, however, welcomed Lord Falconer's
proposal. Sarah Wootton, chief executive of Dignity in Dying – an
organisation that advocates assisted dying for terminally ill
patients, said that the public "overwhelmingly support change".
Ms Wootton commented that the proposed amendment "gives
politicians the opportunity to listen and act." She added: "We
cannot directly regulate foreign assisted suicide clinics, but we
can change the law to end the unnecessary threat of prosecution
whilst safeguarding against abuse."
"Dangerously naïve"
Writing a response in the Times to Lord Falconer's proposals, Dr
Peter Saunders, director of Care Not Killing Alliance, argues that
the existing law does safeguard against an abuse of the system. He
says Lord Falconer is "dangerously naïve" to suppose that people
who are helped to commit suicide are always "'loved ones'", stating
that people with "sinister motives" could exploit a change in the
law.
In a press statement, Mr Saunders said: "The present law is
there to protect vulnerable people and Parliament has firmly
resisted three attempts in the last five years to change it. The
current law acts as an effective deterrent by ensuring that all but
the most determined individuals do not seek to push its
boundaries."
The most recent government statistics show that suicide rates
for both men and women continued to fall in 2007, reaching the
lowest rates since 1991.
Samaritans provides confidential non-judgmental emotional
support, 24 hours a day for anyone who is experiencing feelings of
distress or despair, including those which could lead to suicide.
Call us on 08457 90 90 90 (UK) and 1850 60 90 90 (ROI); or email:
jo@samaritans.org; or talk
to us face to face – visit http://www.samaritans.org/ for
your nearest branch.
More stories
Read more stories about emotional
health
These news stories relating to emotional
health issues are presented here for information purposes
only, and does not constitute official Samaritans policy. All
stories are © Adfero.
Material is intended for general reference only. No liability is
accepted for any errors, or for any losses that may be incurred if
any material is relied on.